SEO Isn’t Dying. It’s Being Absorbed by AI.
SEO is no longer about rankings—it’s about teaching AI systems to understand, trust, and recommend your brand before a click ever happens.

Words by
Isaac Dailey
Search is no longer a list of links—it’s a reasoning system. As LLMs replace rankings with synthesis and recommendation, SEO is being absorbed into something bigger. This is how I think about growth, visibility, and conversion in an AI-first world.
SEO isn't dying.
It's being absorbed by AI—and that changes how growth strategy needs to be designed.
For the last two decades, SEO has been about convincing algorithms to rank pages. For the next decade, it will be about teaching AI systems who to trust, who to cite, and who to recommend.
That's not a tactical shift. It's a structural one.
Because when search becomes inference-driven, the constraint is no longer traffic—it's being understood correctly at scale.
The shift most teams are missing
AI didn't just change how content is written. It changed how decisions are made before a user ever reaches your site.
When someone asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or an AI-powered browser a question, the system doesn't scroll links or compare headlines. It decomposes the question into sub-questions, synthesizes an answer, and often decides on the user's behalf.
By the time a human reaches your site, they aren't exploring.
They're validating.
That flips the role of SEO entirely.
The two-layer web
I design growth strategy assuming every website now serves two audiences:
1. Machines (LLMs, agents, AI browsers)
Their job is to:
understand what you do
trust your information
extract answers
recommend actions
They care about structure, clarity, consistency, and proof.
2. Humans
Their job is to:
feel resonance
confirm trust
see proof quickly
decide whether to act
They care about positioning, story, and credibility.
The new rule is simple:
Machines find you first. Humans believe you next.
If either layer fails, growth stalls.
Why "more content" is the wrong response
Most teams respond to AI by publishing more.
That's a mistake.
LLMs don't reward volume. They reward coverage, structure, and trust.
Internally, models don't answer one question—they fan out:
What does this mean?
Who is this for?
What are the tradeoffs?
What proof exists?
What should happen next?
If your content answers the headline question but ignores those branches, the model will cite the brand that didn't.
This is why broad "ultimate guides" underperform and precise, well-structured answers win.
How I think about SEO now (as a CMO / Head of Growth)
I don't treat SEO as a channel.
I treat it as knowledge architecture for AI systems.
The goal is not:
rankings
traffic
impressions
The goal is:
being the default source models pull from
being framed accurately when summarized
being associated with the right outcomes
being usable by agents, not just readable by people
That changes how strategy is built.
Operating principles
1. Be the model's best source
Traditional SEO optimizes for ranking algorithms. LLM-first SEO optimizes for inference.
That means:
semantic clarity over clever copy
explicit definitions over implication
consistent terminology over creative variation
original data over generic advice
If a model has to guess what you mean, you've already lost.
2. Structure beats persuasion upstream
Persuasion happens after discovery now.
Upstream, structure determines:
whether you're cited
how you're described
what category you're placed in
That's why I obsess over:
clean content anatomy
question-based headers
standalone sections
FAQs that map to fan-out logic
If a paragraph is extracted on its own, it must still be accurate.
3. Trust is machine-graded before it's human-felt
Authority is no longer just social—it's verifiable.
Models cross-check:
credentials
citations
consistency across the web
third-party mentions
freshness and revision patterns
If trust isn't legible to a model, it won't be passed on to a human.
4. SEO and CRO are now inseparable
AI-referred visitors arrive with context.
They've already been told:
what you do
why you're good
how you compare
So the website's job isn't education first anymore—it's confirmation.
That's why I design sites to:
mirror how AI summarizes the brand
surface proof immediately
remove ambiguity fast
make the next action obvious
If AI says you're "fast to implement" and your site hides onboarding speed, conversion drops.
Trust mismatch kills momentum.
5. Prepare for agent-mediated conversion
The next wave of buyers won't always click.
They'll ask systems to:
book calls
pull pricing
compare vendors
schedule demos
Which means your site must be:
structured
explicit
action-ready
Actions, flows, and endpoints are now part of SEO—not separate from it.
What this means for founders and teams
If you're early-stage, this is a compounding advantage. If you're scaling, this is defensive. If you're established, this is existential.
The companies that win won't be the loudest.
They'll be the ones whose knowledge is easiest to:
extract
verify
reuse
and act on
The world I see coming
By the end of this decade:
Search interfaces shrink
Agent-mediated decisions grow
Websites become verification layers
Brands live in AI memory, not just SERPs
Growth won't be about getting traffic.
It will be about being present in the reasoning layer that precedes every decision.
How I structure strategy because of this
I design growth systems that:
assume AI is the first touchpoint
treat content as training data
treat structure as leverage
treat trust as infrastructure
treat conversion as alignment, not persuasion
SEO, content, and CRO are no longer separate disciplines.
They're one system—optimized for how decisions are actually made.
The takeaway
SEO isn't dying.
It's being absorbed into something bigger:
AI discovery
AI trust
AI recommendation
AI action
The question isn't whether this will matter.
It's whether your brand will be understood correctly when it does.



